summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2025-06-30 02:52:13 -0400
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>2025-07-03 20:59:09 -0400
commitb969f9614885c20f903e1d1f9445611daf161d6d (patch)
treee0a9f5af015c2c5ec05c3eba8efdae1d1a62dcac
parentd0b3b7b22dfa1f4b515fd3a295b3fd958f9e81af (diff)
fix proc_sys_compare() handling of in-lookup dentries
There's one case where ->d_compare() can be called for an in-lookup dentry; usually that's nothing special from ->d_compare() point of view, but... proc_sys_compare() is weird. The thing is, /proc/sys subdirectories can look differently for different processes. Up to and including having the same name resolve to different dentries - all of them hashed. The way it's done is ->d_compare() refusing to admit a match unless this dentry is supposed to be visible to this caller. The information needed to discriminate between them is stored in inode; it is set during proc_sys_lookup() and until it's done d_splice_alias() we really can't tell who should that dentry be visible for. Normally there's no negative dentries in /proc/sys; we can run into a dying dentry in RCU dcache lookup, but those can be safely rejected. However, ->d_compare() is also called for in-lookup dentries, before they get positive - or hashed, for that matter. In case of match we will wait until dentry leaves in-lookup state and repeat ->d_compare() afterwards. In other words, the right behaviour is to treat the name match as sufficient for in-lookup dentries; if dentry is not for us, we'll see that when we recheck once proc_sys_lookup() is done with it. While we are at it, fix the misspelled READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE there. Fixes: d9171b934526 ("parallel lookups machinery, part 4 (and last)") Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@brown.name> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-rw-r--r--fs/proc/inode.c2
-rw-r--r--fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c18
2 files changed, 12 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index a3eb3b740f76..3604b616311c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static void proc_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
head = ei->sysctl;
if (head) {
- RCU_INIT_POINTER(ei->sysctl, NULL);
+ WRITE_ONCE(ei->sysctl, NULL);
proc_sys_evict_inode(inode, head);
}
}
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index cc9d74a06ff0..08b78150cdde 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -918,17 +918,21 @@ static int proc_sys_compare(const struct dentry *dentry,
struct ctl_table_header *head;
struct inode *inode;
- /* Although proc doesn't have negative dentries, rcu-walk means
- * that inode here can be NULL */
- /* AV: can it, indeed? */
- inode = d_inode_rcu(dentry);
- if (!inode)
- return 1;
if (name->len != len)
return 1;
if (memcmp(name->name, str, len))
return 1;
- head = rcu_dereference(PROC_I(inode)->sysctl);
+
+ // false positive is fine here - we'll recheck anyway
+ if (d_in_lookup(dentry))
+ return 0;
+
+ inode = d_inode_rcu(dentry);
+ // we just might have run into dentry in the middle of __dentry_kill()
+ if (!inode)
+ return 1;
+
+ head = READ_ONCE(PROC_I(inode)->sysctl);
return !head || !sysctl_is_seen(head);
}