| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, SBI APIs accept a hartmask that is generated from struct
cpumask. Cpumask data structure can hold upto NR_CPUs value. Thus, it
is not the correct data structure for hartids as it can be higher
than NR_CPUs for platforms with sparse or discontguous hartids.
Remove all association between hartid mask and struct cpumask.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For Linux RISC-V changes)
Acked-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> (For KVM RISC-V changes)
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Implement optimized version of the tlb flushing routines for systems
using ASIDs. These are behind the use_asid_allocator static branch to
not affect existing systems not using ASIDs.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
[hch: rebased on top of previous cleanups, use the same algorithm as
the non-ASID based code for local vs global flushes, keep functions
as local as possible]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|
|
Move the call mm_cpumask from the callers into __sbi_tlb_flush_range to
reduce a bit of duplicate code and prepare for future changes.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|
|
Bring Transparent HugePage support to riscv. A
transparent huge page is always represented as a pmd.
Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|
|
Add a parameter: stride for __sbi_tlb_flush_range(),
represent the page stride between the address of start and end.
Normally, the stride is PAGE_SIZE, and when flush huge page
address, the stride can be the huge page size such as:PMD_SIZE,
then it only need to flush one tlb entry if the address range
within PMD_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: Nanyong Sun <sunnanyong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
|
|
If tlbflush request is for page only, there is no need to do a
complete local tlb shootdown.
Just do a local tlb flush for the given address.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
|
|
In RISC-V, tlb flush happens via SBI which is expensive. If the local
cpu is the only cpu in cpumask, there is no need to invoke a SBI call.
Just do a local flush and return.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
|
|
SBI calls are expensive. If cpumask is empty, there is no need to
trap via SBI as no remote tlb flushing is required.
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
|
|
The TLB flush logic is going to become more complex. Start moving
it out of line.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
[paul.walmsley@sifive.com: fixed checkpatch whitespace warnings]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
|
