| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Check VMX features on tertiary execution control in VMCS config setup.
Sub-features in tertiary execution control to be enabled are adjusted
according to hardware capabilities although no sub-feature is enabled
in this patch.
EVMCSv1 doesn't support tertiary VM-execution control, so disable it
when EVMCSv1 is in use. And define the auxiliary functions for Tertiary
control field here, using the new BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW().
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20220419153400.11642-1-guang.zeng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
In preparation to allowing reads from Enlightened VMCS from
handle_vmread(), implement evmcs_field_offset() to get the correct
read offset. get_evmcs_offset(), which is being used by KVM-on-Hyper-V,
is almost what's needed but a few things need to be adjusted. First,
WARN_ON() is unacceptable for handle_vmread() as any field can (in
theory) be supplied by the guest and not all fields are defined in
eVMCS v1. Second, we need to handle 'holes' in eVMCS (missing fields).
It also sounds like a good idea to WARN_ON() if such fields are ever
accessed by KVM-on-Hyper-V.
Implement dedicated evmcs_field_offset() helper.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220112170134.1904308-5-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Similar to MSR_IA32_VMX_EXIT_CTLS/MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_EXIT_CTLS,
MSR_IA32_VMX_ENTRY_CTLS/MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_ENTRY_CTLS pair,
MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS needs to be filtered the same way
MSR_IA32_VMX_PINBASED_CTLS is currently filtered as guests may solely rely
on 'true' MSR data.
Note, none of the currently existing Windows/Hyper-V versions are known
to stumble upon the unfiltered MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS, the change
is aimed at making the filtering future proof.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220112170134.1904308-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Windows Server 2022 with Hyper-V role enabled failed to boot on KVM when
enlightened VMCS is advertised. Debugging revealed there are two exposed
secondary controls it is not happy with: SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC and
SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS. These controls are known to be unsupported,
as there are no corresponding fields in eVMCSv1 (see the comment above
EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_2NDEXEC definition).
Previously, commit 31de3d2500e4 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls
sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()") introduced the required
filtering mechanism for VMX MSRs but for some reason put only known
to be problematic (and not full EVMCS1_UNSUPPORTED_* lists) controls
there.
Note, Windows Server 2022 seems to have gained some sanity check for VMX
MSRs: it doesn't even try to launch a guest when there's something it
doesn't like, nested_evmcs_check_controls() mechanism can't catch the
problem.
Let's be bold this time and instead of playing whack-a-mole just filter out
all unsupported controls from VMX MSRs.
Fixes: 31de3d2500e4 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs()")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210907163530.110066-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
The ROL16(val, n) macro is repeatedly defined in several vmcs-related
files, and it has never been used outside the KVM context.
Let's move it to vmcs.h without any intended functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20210809093410.59304-4-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Instead of checking 'vmx->nested.hv_evmcs' use '-1' in
'vmx->nested.hv_evmcs_vmptr' to indicate 'evmcs is not in use' state. This
matches how we check 'vmx->nested.current_vmptr'. Introduce EVMPTR_INVALID
and evmptr_is_valid() and use it instead of raw '-1' check as a preparation
to adding other 'special' values.
No functional change intended.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210526132026.270394-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID is a vCPU ioctl but its output is now
independent from vCPU and in some cases VMMs may want to use it as a system
ioctl instead. In particular, QEMU doesn CPU feature expansion before any
vCPU gets created so KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID can't be used.
Convert KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID to 'dual' system/vCPU ioctl with the
same meaning.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200929150944.1235688-2-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
It was noticed that evmcs_sanitize_exec_ctrls() is not being executed
nowadays despite the code checking 'enable_evmcs' static key looking
correct. Turns out, static key magic doesn't work in '__init' section
(and it is unclear when things changed) but setup_vmcs_config() is called
only once per CPU so we don't really need it to. Switch to checking
'enlightened_vmcs' instead, it is supposed to be in sync with
'enable_evmcs'.
Opportunistically make evmcs_sanitize_exec_ctrls '__init' and drop unneeded
extra newline from it.
Reported-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20201014143346.2430936-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
In the next patch nested_get_evmcs_version will be always set in kvm_x86_ops for
VMX, even if nesting is disabled. Therefore, check whether VMX (aka nesting)
is available in the function, the caller will not do the check anymore.
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Remove all references to cr3_target_value[0-3] and replace the fields
in vmcs12 with "dead_space" to preserve the vmcs12 layout. KVM doesn't
support emulating CR3-target values, despite a variety of code that
implies otherwise, as KVM unconditionally reports '0' for the number of
supported CR3-target values.
This technically fixes a bug where KVM would incorrectly allow VMREAD
and VMWRITE to nonexistent fields, i.e. cr3_target_value[0-3]. Per
Intel's SDM, the number of supported CR3-target values reported in
VMX_MISC also enumerates the existence of the associated VMCS fields:
If a future implementation supports more than 4 CR3-target values, they
will be encoded consecutively following the 4 encodings given here.
Alternatively, the "bug" could be fixed by actually advertisting support
for 4 CR3-target values, but that'd likely just enable kvm-unit-tests
given that no one has complained about lack of support for going on ten
years, e.g. KVM, Xen and HyperV don't use CR3-target values.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200416000739.9012-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
guests
Sane L1 hypervisors are not supposed to turn any of the unsupported VMX
controls on for its guests and nested_vmx_check_controls() checks for
that. This is, however, not the case for the controls which are supported
on the host but are missing in enlightened VMCS and when eVMCS is in use.
It would certainly be possible to add these missing checks to
nested_check_vm_execution_controls()/_vm_exit_controls()/.. but it seems
preferable to keep eVMCS-specific stuff in eVMCS and reduce the impact on
non-eVMCS guests by doing less unrelated checks. Create a separate
nested_evmcs_check_controls() for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
With fine grained VMX feature enablement QEMU>=4.2 tries to do KVM_SET_MSRS
with default (matching CPU model) values and in case eVMCS is also enabled,
fails.
It would be possible to drop VMX feature filtering completely and make
this a guest's responsibility: if it decides to use eVMCS it should know
which fields are available and which are not. Hyper-V mostly complies to
this, however, there are some problematic controls:
SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES
VM_{ENTRY,EXIT}_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL
which Hyper-V enables. As there are no corresponding fields in eVMCS, we
can't handle this properly in KVM. This is a Hyper-V issue.
Move VMX controls sanitization from nested_enable_evmcs() to vmx_get_msr(),
and do the bare minimum (only clear controls which are known to cause issues).
This allows userspace to keep setting controls it wants and at the same
time hides them from the guest.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
nested_enable_evmcs()
In nested_enable_evmcs() evmcs_already_enabled check doesn't really do
anything: controls are already sanitized and we return '0' regardless.
Just drop the check.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
When Enlightened VMCS is in use, it is valid to do VMCLEAR and,
according to TLFS, this should "transition an enlightened VMCS from the
active to the non-active state". It is, however, wrong to assume that
it is only valid to do VMCLEAR for the eVMCS which is currently active
on the vCPU performing VMCLEAR.
Currently, the logic in handle_vmclear() is broken: in case, there is no
active eVMCS on the vCPU doing VMCLEAR we treat the argument as a 'normal'
VMCS and kvm_vcpu_write_guest() to the 'launch_state' field irreversibly
corrupts the memory area.
So, in case the VMCLEAR argument is not the current active eVMCS on the
vCPU, how can we know if the area it is pointing to is a normal or an
enlightened VMCS?
Thanks to the bug in Hyper-V (see commit 72aeb60c52bf7 ("KVM: nVMX: Verify
eVMCS revision id match supported eVMCS version on eVMCS VMPTRLD")) we can
not, the revision can't be used to distinguish between them. So let's
assume it is always enlightened in case enlightened vmentry is enabled in
the assist page. Also, check if vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled to
minimize the impact for 'unenlightened' workloads.
Fixes: b8bbab928fb1 ("KVM: nVMX: implement enlightened VMPTRLD and VMCLEAR")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Commit e2e871ab2f02 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: Introduce nested_get_evmcs_version()
helper") broke EVMCS enablement: to set vmcs_version we now call
nested_get_evmcs_version() but this function checks
enlightened_vmcs_enabled flag which is not yet set so we end up returning
zero.
Fix the issue by re-arranging things in nested_enable_evmcs().
Fixes: e2e871ab2f02 ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: Introduce nested_get_evmcs_version() helper")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
The upcoming KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID ioctl will need to return
Enlightened VMCS version in HYPERV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES.EAX when
it was enabled.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
The header, evmcs.h, already exists and contains a fair amount of code,
but there are a few pieces in vmx.c that can be moved verbatim. In
addition, move an array definition to evmcs.c to prepare for multiple
consumers of evmcs.h.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
