xfs: fix reflink inefficiencies

As Dave Chinner has complained about on IRC, there are a couple of
things about reflink that are very inefficient.  First of all, we
limited the size of all bunmapi operations to avoid flooding the log
with defer ops in the worst case, but recent changes to the defer ops
code have solved that problem, so get rid of the bunmapi length clamp.

Second, the log reservations for reflink operations are far far larger
than they need to be.  Shrink them to exactly what we need to handle
each deferred RUI and CUI log item, and no more.  Also reduce logcount
because we don't need 8 rolls per operation.  Introduce a transaction
reservation compatibility layer to avoid changing the minimum log size
calculations.

v2: better document the use of EFIs to track when refcount updates
    should be continued in a new transaction, disentangle the alternate
    log space reservation code
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KU+/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----