summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd_early.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-12-06x86, microcode: Reload microcode on resumeBorislav Petkov
Normally, we do reapply microcode on resume. However, in the cases where that microcode comes from the early loader and the late loader hasn't been utilized yet, there's no easy way for us to go and apply the patch applied during boot by the early loader. Thus, reuse the patch stashed by the early loader for the BSP. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-12-01x86, microcode, AMD: Do not use smp_processor_id() in preemtible contextBorislav Petkov
Hand down the cpu number instead, otherwise lockdep screams when doing echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload. BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: amd64-microcode/2470 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x12/0x20 CPU: 1 PID: 2470 Comm: amd64-microcode Not tainted 3.18.0-rc6+ #26 ... Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1417428741-4501-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-11-10x86, microcode, AMD: Fix ucode patch stashing on 32-bitBorislav Petkov
Save the patch while we're running on the BSP instead of later, before the initrd has been jettisoned. More importantly, on 32-bit we need to access the physical address instead of the virtual. This way we actually do find it on the APs instead of having to go through the initrd each time. Tested-by: Richard Hendershot <rshendershot@mchsi.com> Fixes: 5335ba5cf475 ("x86, microcode, AMD: Fix early ucode loading") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+ Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-11-01x86, microcode, AMD: Fix early ucode loading on 32-bitBorislav Petkov
Konrad triggered the following splat below in a 32-bit guest on an AMD box. As it turns out, in save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() we're using the *physical* address of the container *after* we have enabled paging and thus we #PF in load_microcode_amd() when trying to access the microcode container in the ramdisk range. Because the ramdisk is exactly there: [ 0.000000] RAMDISK: [mem 0x35e04000-0x36ef9fff] and we fault at 0x35e04304. And since this guest doesn't relocate the ramdisk, we don't do the computation which will give us the correct virtual address and we end up with the PA. So, we should actually be using virtual addresses on 32-bit too by the time we're freeing the initrd. Do that then! Unpacking initramfs... BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 35d4e304 IP: [<c042e905>] load_microcode_amd+0x25/0x4a0 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.17.1-302.fc21.i686 #1 Hardware name: Xen HVM domU, BIOS 4.4.1 10/01/2014 task: f5098000 ti: f50d0000 task.ti: f50d0000 EIP: 0060:[<c042e905>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0 EIP is at load_microcode_amd+0x25/0x4a0 EAX: 00000000 EBX: f6e9ec4c ECX: 00001ec4 EDX: 00000000 ESI: f5d4e000 EDI: 35d4e2fc EBP: f50d1ed0 ESP: f50d1e94 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 CR0: 8005003b CR2: 35d4e304 CR3: 00e33000 CR4: 000406d0 Stack: 00000000 00000000 f50d1ebc f50d1ec4 f5d4e000 c0d7735a f50d1ed0 15a3d17f f50d1ec4 00600f20 00001ec4 bfb83203 f6e9ec4c f5d4e000 c0d7735a f50d1ed8 c0d80861 f50d1ee0 c0d80429 f50d1ef0 c0d889a9 f5d4e000 c0000000 f50d1f04 Call Trace: ? unpack_to_rootfs ? unpack_to_rootfs save_microcode_in_initrd_amd save_microcode_in_initrd free_initrd_mem populate_rootfs ? unpack_to_rootfs do_one_initcall ? unpack_to_rootfs ? repair_env_string ? proc_mkdir kernel_init_freeable kernel_init ret_from_kernel_thread ? rest_init Reported-and-tested-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> References: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158204 Fixes: 75a1ba5b2c52 ("x86, microcode, AMD: Unify valid container checks") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141101100100.GA4462@pd.tnic Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2014-07-24x86, microcode, amd: Fix missing static declarationHenrique de Moraes Holschuh
Make locally used variable static. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1406146251-8540-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
2014-02-06x86, microcode, AMD: Unify valid container checksBorislav Petkov
For additional coverage, BorisO and friends unknowlingly did swap AMD microcode with Intel microcode blobs in order to see what happens. What did happen on 32-bit was [ 5.722656] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at be3a6008 [ 5.722693] IP: [<c106d6b4>] load_microcode_amd+0x24/0x3f0 [ 5.722716] *pdpt = 0000000000000000 *pde = 0000000000000000 because there was a valid initrd there but without valid microcode in it and the container check happened *after* the relocated ramdisk handling on 32-bit, which was clearly wrong. While at it, take care of the ramdisk relocation on both 32- and 64-bit as it is done on both. Also, comment what we're doing because this code is a bit tricky. Reported-and-tested-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391460104-7261-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2014-01-13x86, microcode: Move to a proper locationBorislav Petkov
We've grown a bunch of microcode loader files all prefixed with "microcode_". They should be under cpu/ because this is strictly CPU-related functionality so do that and drop the prefix since they're in their own directory now which gives that prefix. :) While at it, drop MICROCODE_INTEL_LIB config item and stash the functionality under CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL as it was its only user. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>