Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
We generate them incorrectly anyways, but this way at least we're allowed to
compile it.
|
|
They're instantiable, yes, but otherwise there's no way they'd work correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That ofc appeared on Gecko...
|
|
Those are generally just-declared types, and wasn't being translated
yet.
|
|
replacement into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It broke for arrays if we try to do it by default, but this seems to
work pretty well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So it's not awfully broken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since now the struct definition might depend on those types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|