#! /bin/bash # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 # Copyright (C) 2021 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved. # # FS QA Test No. btrfs/241 # # Test that an incremental send operation succeeds, and produces the correct # results, after renaming and moving around directories and files with multiple # hardlinks, in such a way that one of the files gets the old name and location # of a directory and another name (hardlink) with the old name and location of # another file that was located in that same directory. # . ./common/preamble _begin_fstest auto quick send # Override the default cleanup function. _cleanup() { cd / rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } . ./common/filter _supported_fs btrfs _require_test _require_scratch _require_fssum send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test files and directory. Inode 259 (file3) has two hard links. touch $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 touch $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 touch $SCRATCH_MNT/file3 mkdir $SCRATCH_MNT/A ln $SCRATCH_MNT/file3 $SCRATCH_MNT/A/hard_link # Filesystem looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- file1 (ino 257) # |----- file2 (ino 258) # |----- file3 (ino 259) # |----- A/ (ino 260) # |---- hard_link (ino 259) # # Now create the base snapshot, which is going to be the parent snapshot for # a later incremental send and receive. $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 > /dev/null $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -f $send_files_dir/1.snap \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>&1 1>/dev/null | _filter_scratch # Move inode 257 into directory inode 260. This results in computing the path # for inode 260 as "/A" and caching it. mv $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 $SCRATCH_MNT/A/file1 # Move inode 258 (file2) into directory inode 260, with a name of "hard_link", # moving first inode 259 away since it currently has that location and name. mv $SCRATCH_MNT/A/hard_link $SCRATCH_MNT/tmp mv $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 $SCRATCH_MNT/A/hard_link # Now rename inode 260 to something else (B for example) and then create a hard # link for inode 258 that has the old name and location of inode 260 ("/A"). mv $SCRATCH_MNT/A $SCRATCH_MNT/B ln $SCRATCH_MNT/B/hard_link $SCRATCH_MNT/A # Filesystem now looks like: # # . (ino 256) # |----- tmp (ino 259) # |----- file3 (ino 259) # |----- B/ (ino 260) # | |---- file1 (ino 257) # | |---- hard_link (ino 258) # | # |----- A (ino 258) # Create another snapshot of our subvolume and use it for an incremental send. $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 > /dev/null $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/2.snap \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>&1 1>/dev/null | _filter_scratch $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $send_files_dir/2.fssum \ -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify we get # the same content that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # First add the first snapshot to the new filesystem by applying the first send # stream. $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/1.snap $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null # The incremental receive operation below used to fail with the following error: # # ERROR: unlink A/hard_link failed: No such file or directory # # This is because when send is processing inode 257, it generates the path for # inode 260 as "/A", since that inode is its parent in the send snapshot, and # caches that path. # # Later when processing inode 258, it first processes its new reference that has # the path of "/A", which results in orphanizing inode 260 because there is a # a path collision. This results in issuing a rename operation from "/A" to # "/o260-6-0". # # Finally when processing the new reference "B/hard_link" for inode 258, it # notices that it collides with inode 259 (not yet processed, because it has a # higher inode number), since that inode has the name "hard_link" under the # directory inode 260. It also checks that inode 259 has two hardlinks, so it # decides to issue a unlink operation for the name "hard_link" for inode 259. # However the path passed to the unlink operation is "/A/hard_link", which is # incorrect since currently "/A" does not exists, due to the orphanization of # inode 260 mentioned before. The path is incorrect because it was computed and # cached before the orphanization. This results in the receiver to fail with the # above error. # $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive -f $send_files_dir/2.snap $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $FSSUM_PROG -r $send_files_dir/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 status=0 exit